Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > The Riverside Inn

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Oct 07, 2006, 06:40 PM // 18:40   #41
Jungle Guide
 
Arcanis the Omnipotent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Guild: Nova Alliance
Profession: Me/
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

I really think that problems with FA and JQ are the one sidedness of them.

Whoever is the attacking force usually has an incredibly unfair advantage. During the first Double Faction weekend, I took my B/P ranger in on the Luxon side because I wanted to build up Jade for when my Ele got there for his 15K.

My build included, Barrage, Pin Down, Favorable Winds (which helped in something I'll explain later), My Pet with Comfort, Troll and Poisoness Bite.

And what would I do in this mission? Storm the fort? Hell no. Usually me and one other guy would stay out side and run back and forth between the Purple and Orange amber mines. Killing the NPCs, and the players who tried to take the mines back. Pin Down would slow down Amber runners long enough to be killed. Then when the Mines were taken, I'd lay down a Favorable Winds for the Luxon Ranger NPC's that would pop up. Instantly making them strong enough to hold their own for awhile incase I didnt get back in time.

Me and some other guy (Usually an MM worked best) would hold both mines until finally the Kurzicks had been pushed so far into the gate that it was pointless to stay out there. Our other duty was simpy to resend the Turtles every time they'd reload.

It only takes two Luxons to hold the entire outside area.


Not having played the Jade Quarry much, I cant say if the same thing is true for the Kurzicks there. But I do remember playing on the Kurzick side and never losing.
Arcanis the Omnipotent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 07, 2006, 06:44 PM // 18:44   #42
Forge Runner
 
Bowstring Badass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Character selection screen figuring what I want to play...
Guild: Purple Lingerie - :D
Default

Maybe they do not have factions? After all you need factions to play there.
Bowstring Badass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 07, 2006, 06:49 PM // 18:49   #43
Jungle Guide
 
Arcanis the Omnipotent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Guild: Nova Alliance
Profession: Me/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowstring Badass
Maybe they do not have factions? After all you need factions to play there.
Since when? I've gone and played as Kurzick, with Kurzick faction, on the Luxon side.
Arcanis the Omnipotent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 07, 2006, 06:56 PM // 18:56   #44
The Hotshot
 
lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Honolulu
Guild: International District [id多]
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanis the Omnipotent
Since when? I've gone and played as Kurzick, with Kurzick faction, on the Luxon side.
I'm fairly sure that he meant that one must possess a copy of Guild Wars: Factions to play.
lemming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 07, 2006, 09:09 PM // 21:09   #45
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Tozen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Guild: All Senses Failed [aSF]
Profession: A/N
Default

Why don't I play those missions?

In less than 5 minutes I can earn 1250 faction in an alliance battle, but even if I lose I still get at least 500 on average.

On the other hand, the competative missions award 750 experience for winning a 15 minute game, and only about 180 or so on average if you lose.

Obvious choice for me lol!
Tozen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 07, 2006, 09:16 PM // 21:16   #46
Jungle Guide
 
Count to Potato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Imagination Land
Guild: I Swear She Was Eighteen [Gwen]
Profession: W/
Default

takes too long to enter missions
Count to Potato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 09, 2006, 01:06 AM // 01:06   #47
TB_
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
TB_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Default

There are several reasons why i think theyve failed:

1. Less Faction than AB for the same work.

This is the biggest issue of all and needs to be fixed pronto.

2. Player Bias and Access differences.

Its a snap to get to aspenwood and the quarry from the luxon side, but it is much harder on the kurzick side. I asked a dev about this during the beta and he said they were fixing it at the time, of course he was spouting crap. But its more than just getting to the area, when there is player biases at the small hours (which AN seems to think doesnt exist) there is nothing you can do about it in PvEvP or AB. However a possible reward of some kind could help, a faction boost or something on slow times for that side perhaps. Something to get people moving there.

3. Teams.

Random teams are fine for some things but when you want to play with your mates PvEvP missions simply dont allow that, at least not with risk. Allowing the 1-4 team like before they messed up AB would help greatly.

Last edited by TB_; Oct 09, 2006 at 01:13 AM // 01:13..
TB_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 09, 2006, 01:16 AM // 01:16   #48
Desert Nomad
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IGN: Scarlet Test Ace
Guild: We play Isketch in [HoH]
Profession: E/
Default

poeple might know but if you are in a serious FF guild then you will be FFing and Abing half the time. battles like fort aspenwood just arent worth it any mroe becuase in the time you do 1 battle in fort of jade you can do about 5 FF runs.
Loki Seiguro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 09, 2006, 06:54 PM // 18:54   #49
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Kais Unduli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Room V
Default

Fort Aspenwood can be a lot of fun, or it can be a terrible drag. I've been on teams that had 3 leechers plus 1 leaver, meaning it was 4 v 8.

Almost every Kurzick team has a leecher. I haven't played the Luxon side that often, but the Kurzick side is at a disadvantage already, nevermind being short 2 players cause they're leechbots.
Kais Unduli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 09, 2006, 10:35 PM // 22:35   #50
Krytan Explorer
 
The truth itself's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Denmark
Guild: First Degree
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kais Unduli
Fort Aspenwood can be a lot of fun, or it can be a terrible drag. I've been on teams that had 3 leechers plus 1 leaver, meaning it was 4 v 8.

Almost every Kurzick team has a leecher. I haven't played the Luxon side that often, but the Kurzick side is at a disadvantage already, nevermind being short 2 players cause they're leechbots.

Also, if they don't have a healer og any sort, they can't heal the NPCs, which will result in early.

..and those NPC healers there are just terrible.. not even close to "bad" in terms of skill level.
The truth itself is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 10, 2006, 02:04 AM // 02:04   #51
Furnace Stoker
 
Nevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Jazzy
Base defence is actually pretty fun. It's like helm's deep...and everyone loved helms deep
Not even close, the two are on such different scales. To even have resemblence the kurzick's and luxons would each need about 100 more men on each side.
Nevin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 10, 2006, 02:14 AM // 02:14   #52
Echo-mending Master
 
Spirit Of Azrael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Guild: Service of Shadows [SOS]
Profession: W/N
Default

JQ is fun as hell. Ive played it once and wish it wasnt abandoned. I love it.
Spirit Of Azrael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 10, 2006, 02:08 PM // 14:08   #53
Krytan Explorer
 
Cymmina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Profession: Me/N
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanis the Omnipotent
I really think that problems with FA and JQ are the one sidedness of them.
False! Jade Quarry is a perfectly symmetrical map.
Cymmina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 10, 2006, 07:44 PM // 19:44   #54
Hell's Protector
 
Jetdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Guild: The Eyes of Texas [BEVO]
Profession: D/A
Default

1. Alliance battles are a bit more organized and provide more faction in a quicker timeframe.

2. Fort Aspenwood is incredibly fun (IMO), but the leechers, etal put a real drag on probably 50% of contests.

3. Jade Quarry is just plain boring when you can have a much better experience in Alliance Battles using the same concept (capturing shrines, etc.).

I alternate between Kurzick and Luxon sides in Aspenwood, and I have to say that neither side is really dominating. A decent bonder on the Kurzick side will usually push the Kurzicks to victory, while an anti-bonder build on the Luxon side will usually be the difference for a Luxon win. Generally the two don't meet, and you see one side dominating the other (which is usually the side I'm on... ).
Jetdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 10, 2006, 09:58 PM // 21:58   #55
Jungle Guide
 
Zakarr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Finland
Default

Fort Aspenwood is one of the best things in GW. Too bad it is a bit unfair and leeches are often spoiling the fun. The idea itself is wonderful. More this kind of PvP places, please.
Zakarr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 10, 2006, 11:24 PM // 23:24   #56
Jungle Guide
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Default

Fort Aspenwood has a ton of potential as an organized gametype. There are a lot of possibilities that open up when you're not just limited to meeting the other team head-on and smashing their face in.

It's also a lot of fun when you get a decent team (one or two healers, no leechers, players who aren't retarded).
Symbol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 11, 2006, 10:39 AM // 10:39   #57
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Traveller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Finland
Guild: League of Extraordinary Explorers [LOST] (my one man guild)
Profession: Me/
Default

I've done quite a bit Aspenwood lately with my various characters and I tend to agree that the worst problem is - once again - the community. Leechers? You bet! Ragequitters? Naturally! Just plain jerks and idiots? Why, of course!

It's very rare that you get into a team that listens, communicates and plans things out. Once you do, Aspenwood is loads of fun. If the other team is good as well, you can have very epic and memorable battles, where the tide swifts and you can really enjoy the fight.

Even so, the rewards would need a boost. Compared to AB and time spent, Aspenwood is a joke. (Especially Kurzick side) But there's also a downside - if they boost the rewards and keep random teams, chances are that there will be even more leechers.
Traveller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 11, 2006, 11:17 AM // 11:17   #58
Jungle Guide
 
Snowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wales, UK
Guild: Devils Scorpions
Profession: W/E
Default

I actually Love playing FA on the Kurzick side (even tho im luxon)..

I dont personally find it gets boring at all, I can play them just as repetativly as AvA..

As has been said though, the frustration is the AFK'ers which ANET have made it quite clear, plain and simple.. they WONT do ANYTHING about it.

They should make it two teams of 4 at least to add some competativeness to them.

As we move to Nightfall this will get more and more "swept under the carpet" by ANET.

A crying shame.
Snowman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 11, 2006, 02:26 PM // 14:26   #59
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Cirian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: European Union
Guild: The Amazon Basin
Default

I've played Aspenwood quite a bit but not AB yet. By the sounds of it, I'm missing out big time... whoooooops But as some other posters have said, when Aspenwood gets good teams on either side (like... 1 in 20 games maybe), then it's great. But it is a lot of hard work for not much reward, speaking as a Kurzick. Losing at the last second only gives ~120 faction, while winning gives 650. AB sounds... much better.
Cirian is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:08 PM // 16:08.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("